Radeon R5 A220 vs RX Vega Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameVega 10Caicos
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096160
Core clock speed1200 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate395.86.200
ROPs644
TMUs2568

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length152 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MBps1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega Nano has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

R5 A220, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Nano and Radeon R5 A220. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
Radeon RX Vega Nano
AMD Radeon R5 A220
Radeon R5 A220

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Nano or Radeon R5 A220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.