Quadro P600 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P500 Quadro P520 Quadro P600 Quadro P620

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Quadro P600, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
10.09
+17.2%

RX Vega M GL outperforms P600 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
Quadro P600 Quadro P600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking451500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.62
Power efficiency10.6914.82
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 22GP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)7 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$178

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280384
Core clock speed931 MHz1430 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8838.88
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.244 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1252 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s80.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 10.09
+17.2%
Quadro P600 8.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3878
+17.1%
Quadro P600 3311

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+11.1%
36
−11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.94

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+20%
65−70
−20%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+33.3%
27
−33.3%
Fortnite 55−60
+15.7%
50−55
−15.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−21.8%
95
+21.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%
World of Tanks 140−150
+13.3%
120−130
−13.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−100%
72
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+14.7%
65−70
−14.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
World of Tanks 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and Quadro P600 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is 11% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 33% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P600 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is ahead in 9 tests (14%)
  • Quadro P600 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 52 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.09 8.61
Recency 1 February 2018 7 February 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 40 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 17.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

Quadro P600, on the other hand, has 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook card while Quadro P600 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
vs
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 670MX SLI GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
HD 8790M Radeon HD 8790M
vs
HD 8570D Radeon HD 8570D
A10G A10G
vs
Instinct MI250 Radeon Instinct MI250
RX 6800 Radeon RX 6800
vs
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
vs
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
vs
Steam Deck GPU Steam Deck GPU
R5 M430 Radeon R5 M430
vs
R5 230 Radeon R5 230
RTX 4060 AD106 GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
vs
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU M3 Max 40-Core GPU
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
Quadro 3000M Quadro 3000M
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
RTX 2080 RTX 2080
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 217 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.