GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
8.73

RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms RX Vega M GL by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking457251
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Power efficiency10.6221.52
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 22GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802048
Core clock speed931 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1057 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8867.65
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs8064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 8.73
RTX 3050 Mobile 20.41
+134%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3901
RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
+134%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−166%
93
+166%
1440p21−24
−143%
51
+143%
4K12−14
−167%
32
+167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−96.5%
110−120
+96.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−153%
85−90
+153%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−72.2%
240−250
+72.2%
Dota 2 65−70
−149%
169
+149%
Fortnite 55−60
−96.5%
110−120
+96.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−256%
128
+256%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−153%
85−90
+153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−572%
168
+572%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 65−70
−128%
155
+128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−153%
85−90
+153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−160%
65
+160%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−96.5%
110−120
+96.5%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−185%
57
+185%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−340%
44
+340%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−166%
93
+166%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 127
+0%
127
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 106
+0%
106
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 99
+0%
99
+0%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+0%
83
+0%
Far Cry 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 57
+0%
57
+0%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
+0%
57
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+0%
36
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 23
+0%
23
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 166% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 143% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 167% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 572% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 17 tests (27%)
  • there's a draw in 46 tests (73%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.73 20.41
Recency 1 February 2018 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 15.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 133.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 4850 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.