GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

Place in the ranking	449	524
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	1.76
Power efficiency	10.74	3.22
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	GF114
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2018 (7 years ago)	25 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	384
Core clock speed	931 MHz	823 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,000 million	1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	170 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	52.67
Floating-point processing power	2.588 TFLOPS	1.263 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1002 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	128.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 9.68
+27.5%

GTX 560 Ti 7.59

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3898
+27.5%

GTX 560 Ti 3057

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	80−85 +27%	63 −27%
Full HD	80−85 +27%	63 −27%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.95

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite	55−60 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +30%	60−65 −30%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 +28.6%	27−30 −28.6%
Fortnite	55−60 +25.5%	45−50 −25.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +28.6%	27−30 −28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +23.8%	60−65 −23.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
World of Tanks	140−150 +21.7%	120−130 −21.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	35−40 +28.6%	27−30 −28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +23.8%	60−65 −23.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60
+31.1%

45−50

−31.1%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2	20−22 +5.3%	18−20 −5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

10−12

+37.5%

8−9
−37.5%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Valorant	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
World of Tanks	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Valorant	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Fortnite	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and GTX 560 Ti compete in popular games:

RX Vega M GL is 27% faster in 900p
RX Vega M GL is 27% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 29% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega M GL is ahead in 11 tests (17%)
there's a draw in 52 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.68	7.59
Recency	1 February 2018	25 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	170 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 27.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 161.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.