Arc A730M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL and Arc A730M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
8.73

Arc A730M outperforms RX Vega M GL by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking458220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.6623.28
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code namePolaris 22DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12803072
Core clock speed931 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88393.6
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS12.6 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 8.73
Arc A730M 23.47
+169%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3901
Arc A730M 10487
+169%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−174%
74
+174%
1440p16−18
−181%
45
+181%
4K8−9
−175%
22
+175%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−118%
120−130
+118%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−83.2%
260−270
+83.2%
Dota 2 65−70
−32.4%
90
+32.4%
Fortnite 55−60
−118%
120−130
+118%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−100%
72
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−340%
110
+340%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 65−70
−17.6%
80
+17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−194%
100−105
+194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−80%
45
+80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
−118%
120−130
+118%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−70%
34
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−280%
35−40
+280%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−134%
80−85
+134%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−211%
27−30
+211%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−211%
27−30
+211%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 169
+0%
169
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70
+0%
70
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+0%
64
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 49
+0%
49
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 102
+0%
102
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RX Vega M GL and Arc A730M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A730M is 174% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A730M is 181% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A730M is 175% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A730M is 340% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A730M is ahead in 17 tests (26%)
  • there's a draw in 49 tests (74%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.73 23.47
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 80 Watt

RX Vega M GL has 23.1% lower power consumption.

Arc A730M, on the other hand, has a 168.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A730M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 112 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Arc A730M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.