GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Place in the ranking	372	207
Place by popularity	not in top-100	88
Power efficiency	14.83	24.26
Architecture	Vega (2017−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Vega Kaby Lake-G	GA106
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2018 (6 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	2560
Core clock speed	931 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1035 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	82.80
Floating-point processing power	no data	5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	48
TMUs	no data	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL / 870 13.93

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.29
+88.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega M GL / 870 9862

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057
+83.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega M GL / 870 7329

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360
+82.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega M GL / 870 38812

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 72925
+87.9%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega M GL / 870 299071

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 422757
+41.4%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega M GL / 870 2072

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 5170
+150%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	41 −80.5%	74 +80.5%
1440p	28 −57.1%	44 +57.1%
4K	13 −108%	27 +108%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−182%

62
+182%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	47 −17%	55−60 +17%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −161%	60 +161%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −78.3%	80−85 +78.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 −54.5%	50−55 +54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −168%	59 +168%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −75.8%	55−60 +75.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −57%	140−150 +57%
Hitman 3	27−30 −196%	80 +196%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −57.5%	110−120 +57.5%
Metro Exodus	53 −170%	143 +170%
Red Dead Redemption 2	48 −104%	98 +104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −84.8%	85−90 +84.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −204%	231 +204%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −66.7%	55−60 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −52.2%	35 +52.2%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −78.3%	80−85 +78.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30 −70%	50−55 +70%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −105%	45 +105%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −75.8%	55−60 +75.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −66.7%	65−70 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −57%	140−150 +57%
Hitman 3	27−30 −185%	77 +185%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −57.5%	110−120 +57.5%
Metro Exodus	41 −178%	114 +178%
Red Dead Redemption 2	37 −111%	78 +111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −128%	105 +128%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −58.8%	50−55 +58.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −167%	203 +167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 −139%	55−60 +139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −13%	26 +13%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20 −155%	50−55 +155%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −81.8%	40 +81.8%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −75.8%	55−60 +75.8%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −57%	140−150 +57%
Hitman 3	27−30 −148%	67 +148%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −26%	92 +26%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −95.7%	90 +95.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 −108%	50 +108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +171%	28 −171%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−153%

81
+153%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −72.7%	35−40 +72.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −136%	26 +136%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12 −133%	27−30 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −214%	22 +214%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −95.9%	140−150 +95.9%
Hitman 3	16−18 −171%	46 +171%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −138%	69 +138%
Metro Exodus	27 −122%	60 +122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −144%	61 +144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −107%	30−35 +107%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −58%	139 +58%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−167%

56
+167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −90%	18−20 +90%
Hitman 3	10−11 −100%	20 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −80.3%	120−130 +80.3%
Metro Exodus	15 −213%	47 +213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −107%	29 +107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	11 −36.4%	14−16 +36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4 −250%	14−16 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10 +400%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −78.9%	30−35 +78.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −162%	34 +162%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −66.7%	10 +66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−190%

29
+190%

This is how RX Vega M GL / 870 and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 80% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 57% faster in 1440p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 108% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega M GL / 870 is 171% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega M GL / 870 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.93	26.29
Recency	7 January 2018	11 May 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	75 Watt

RX Vega M GL / 870 has 15.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 88.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.