Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

Place in the ranking	322	573
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.77	30.06
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	Ice Lake GT2
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	512
Core clock speed	1063 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1190 MHz	1000 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	114.2	32.00
Floating-point processing power	3.656 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	8
TMUs	96	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 17.10
+161%

Iris Plus Graphics 950 6.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GH 6572
+161%

Iris Plus Graphics 950 2519

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 +176%	21−24 −176%
1440p	44 +175%	16−18 −175%
4K	30 +200%	10−12 −200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +179%	14−16 −179%
Elden Ring	50−55 +194%	18−20 −194%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	53 +194%	18−20 −194%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 +200%	5−6 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	85 +183%	30−33 −183%
Metro Exodus	55 +162%	21−24 −162%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +179%	14−16 −179%
Valorant	65−70 +188%	24−27 −188%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +162%	21−24 −162%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Dota 2	76 +181%	27−30 −181%
Elden Ring	50−55 +194%	18−20 −194%
Far Cry 5	46 +188%	16−18 −188%
Fortnite	90−95 +166%	35−40 −166%
Forza Horizon 4	68 +183%	24−27 −183%
Grand Theft Auto V	60 +186%	21−24 −186%
Metro Exodus	38 +171%	14−16 −171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	71 +163%	27−30 −163%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +193%	14−16 −193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +194%	18−20 −194%
Valorant	41 +193%	14−16 −193%
World of Tanks	210−220 +164%	80−85 −164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +193%	14−16 −193%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Dota 2	95 +171%	35−40 −171%
Far Cry 5	63 +163%	24−27 −163%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +171%	21−24 −171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	47 +161%	18−20 −161%
Valorant	65−70 +188%	24−27 −188%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Elden Ring	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 +165%	60−65 −165%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
World of Tanks	110−120 +162%	45−50 −162%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Cyberpunk 2077	2	0−1
Far Cry 5	42 +163%	16−18 −163%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +171%	14−16 −171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +175%	8−9 −175%
Valorant	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Dota 2	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Elden Ring	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Metro Exodus	11 +175%	4−5 −175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	49 +172%	18−20 −172%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14 +180%	5−6 −180%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Dota 2	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Far Cry 5	21 +163%	8−9 −163%
Fortnite	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +178%	9−10 −178%
Valorant	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%