GeForce MX570 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M GH
2018
4 GB HBM2, 100 Watt
17.06
+14.7%

RX Vega M GH outperforms MX570 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking320355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.7040.80
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 22GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362048
Core clock speed1063 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate114.273.92
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs6440
TMUs9664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 17.06
+14.7%
GeForce MX570 14.88

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GH 6572
+14.6%
GeForce MX570 5735

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+18%
50−55
−18%
1440p37
+23.3%
30−35
−23.3%
4K29
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+29.4%
30−35
−29.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+16.7%
45−50
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 52
+26.8%
40−45
−26.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+12.5%
95−100
−12.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+11.8%
75−80
−11.8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
−5.1%
40−45
+5.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+72.9%
45−50
−72.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+7.7%
75−80
−7.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+11.8%
30−35
−11.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 33
−45.5%
45−50
+45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+12.5%
95−100
−12.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+11.8%
75−80
−11.8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
+17.1%
40−45
−17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68
+41.7%
45−50
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+7.7%
75−80
−7.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+12.5%
95−100
−12.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+17.9%
27−30
−17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 56
−35.7%
75−80
+35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+18.8%
45−50
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+7.7%
75−80
−7.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 28
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+34.5%
27−30
−34.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−100%
8−9
+100%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+19.5%
75−80
−19.5%
Hitman 3 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+13.2%
90−95
−13.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+17.6%
70−75
−17.6%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+15%
20−22
−15%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%

This is how RX Vega M GH and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GH is 18% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GH is 23% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GH is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega M GH is 73% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GH is ahead in 60 tests (83%)
  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.06 14.88
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

RX Vega M GH has a 14.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.