ATI Radeon 7000 vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5031544
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Power efficiency40.98no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameVegaRV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data183 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.55
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_17.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22no data
1440p16no data
4K10no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24 no data
Counter-Strike 2 63 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 19 no data
Battlefield 5 39 no data
Counter-Strike 2 43 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 13 no data
Far Cry 5 21 no data
Fortnite 47 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 33 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 11 no data
Battlefield 5 33 no data
Counter-Strike 2 19 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 48 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9 no data
Dota 2 51 no data
Far Cry 5 20 no data
Fortnite 31 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 28 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 19 no data
Metro Exodus 16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9 no data
Dota 2 48 no data
Far Cry 5 19 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 no data
Valorant 37 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9 no data
Metro Exodus 10 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22 no data
Valorant 95−100 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5 no data
Far Cry 5 16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10 no data
Metro Exodus 6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 18 no data
Far Cry 5 8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 19 February 2001
Chip lithography 7 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 18 years, a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 53.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1370 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 196 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.