RTX A2000 Embedded vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with RTX A2000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
8.61

RTX A2000 Embedded outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking496184
Place by popularity32not in top-100
Power efficiency41.1262.51
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVegaGA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122560
Core clock speedno data607 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz1177 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data94.16
Floating-point processing powerno data6.026 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−248%
80−85
+248%
1440p16
−244%
55−60
+244%
4K9
−233%
30−35
+233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−246%
45−50
+246%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−242%
65−70
+242%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−233%
30−33
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−233%
50−55
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 32
−244%
110−120
+244%
Forza Horizon 5 21
−233%
70−75
+233%
Metro Exodus 27
−252%
95−100
+252%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−233%
110−120
+233%
Valorant 44
−241%
150−160
+241%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−233%
30−33
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Dota 2 29
−245%
100−105
+245%
Far Cry 5 30
−233%
100−105
+233%
Fortnite 50−55
−240%
180−190
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−252%
95−100
+252%
Forza Horizon 5 13
−246%
45−50
+246%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
−242%
65−70
+242%
Metro Exodus 19
−242%
65−70
+242%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 57
−251%
200−210
+251%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
−233%
40−45
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
Valorant 14
−221%
45−50
+221%
World of Tanks 48
−254%
170−180
+254%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−233%
30−33
+233%
Dota 2 48
−254%
170−180
+254%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−248%
80−85
+248%
Forza Horizon 5 14
−221%
45−50
+221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−243%
240−250
+243%
Valorant 37
−251%
130−140
+251%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 9
−233%
30−33
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−233%
30−33
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
−241%
75−80
+241%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
World of Tanks 21
−233%
70−75
+233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 2
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−244%
55−60
+244%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Metro Exodus 17
−253%
60−65
+253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Valorant 39
−233%
130−140
+233%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Dota 2 10
−250%
35−40
+250%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−250%
35−40
+250%
Metro Exodus 6
−250%
21−24
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 13
−246%
45−50
+246%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−250%
35−40
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Dota 2 18
−233%
60−65
+233%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Fortnite 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Valorant 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and RTX A2000 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Embedded is 248% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 Embedded is 244% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 Embedded is 233% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.61 30.54
Recency 7 January 2020 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 254.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The RTX A2000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
RTX A2000 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1297 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.