GeForce 9300M GS vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 470 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 39 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | no data |
| GPU code name | Vega | NB9M-GS |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 8 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 8 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 550 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2100 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 210 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 4.400 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 0.0224 gflops |
| Gigaflops | no data | 34 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | MXM-I |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 11.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2020 | 4 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 13 Watt |
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
9300M GS, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce 9300M GS. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
