Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking659not rated
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Power efficiency20.75no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeLiverpool 16nm
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)7 September 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121152
Core clock speed300 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate57.6057.60
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3272

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Lengthno data288 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1*
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.21.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 7 September 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while Playstation 4 Slim GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1463 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 148 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.