GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking656not rated
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Power efficiency20.91no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeGP106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)27 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121280
Core clock speedno data1265 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rateno data118.4
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data8008 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 27 June 2017
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has an age advantage of 3 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1398 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 72 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.