CMP 170HX 10 GB vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking125not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.00no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVegaGA100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964480
Core clock speed1630 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate395.8394.8
Floating-point processing power12.66 gflopsno data
ROPs64128
TMUs256280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB10 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s1.56 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2017 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 250 Watt

CMP 170HX 10 GB has an age advantage of 4 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 18% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 and CMP 170HX 10 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 10 GB
CMP 170HX 10 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 665 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate CMP 170HX 10 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.