B200 SXM 192 GB vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell (2024)
GPU code nameVega 10GB100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 August 2017 (7 years ago)2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409616896
Core clock speed1408 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1668 MHz1837 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million208,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)345 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate427.0969.9
Floating-point processing power13.66 TFLOPS62.08 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs256528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length282 mmno data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB96 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s4.1 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 345 Watt 1000 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling has 189.9% lower power consumption.

B200 SXM 192 GB, on the other hand, has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and B200 SXM 192 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop card while B200 SXM 192 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 31 vote

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.