T550 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with T550 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
6.04

T550 Mobile outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking586396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.6137.23
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega RenoirTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed400 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data106.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.41 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 6.04
T550 Mobile 12.49
+107%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 4210
T550 Mobile 8067
+91.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 2793
T550 Mobile 4890
+75.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 21857
T550 Mobile 33219
+52%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 852
T550 Mobile 1928
+126%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−155%
51
+155%
1440p28
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%
4K20
−100%
40−45
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−88.2%
30−35
+88.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−68.3%
65−70
+68.3%
Hitman 3 11
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 97
+73.2%
55−60
−73.2%
Metro Exodus 23
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 22
−31.8%
27−30
+31.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−3.2%
60−65
+3.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−88.2%
30−35
+88.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−167%
16−18
+167%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−68.3%
65−70
+68.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 73
+30.4%
55−60
−30.4%
Metro Exodus 17
−94.1%
30−35
+94.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−107%
27−30
+107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
−100%
42
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50
−28%
60−65
+28%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−68.3%
65−70
+68.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−46.2%
18−20
+46.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 17
−229%
55−60
+229%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−100%
36
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−81.8%
20
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−25.5%
60−65
+25.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−107%
27−30
+107%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−147%
45−50
+147%
Hitman 3 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hitman 3 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and T550 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T550 Mobile is 155% faster in 1080p
  • T550 Mobile is 96% faster in 1440p
  • T550 Mobile is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 73% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T550 Mobile is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • T550 Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.04 12.49
Recency 7 January 2020 on May 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 53.3% lower power consumption.

T550 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 106.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The T550 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook graphics card while T550 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA T550 Mobile
T550 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 695 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 26 votes

Rate T550 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.