ATI Radeon 9000 vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with Radeon 9000, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
6.07
+60600%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms ATI 9000 by a whopping 60600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5871511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.860.02
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameVega RenoirRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed400 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_18.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20-0−1
1440p22-0−1
4K17-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 11 0−1
Elden Ring 16−18 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 26 0−1
Metro Exodus 14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 22 0−1
Valorant 25 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3 0−1
Dota 2 24 0−1
Elden Ring 8 0−1
Far Cry 5 26 0−1
Fortnite 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 15 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 0−1
Valorant 12 0−1
World of Tanks 56 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Dota 2 40 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 0−1
Valorant 19 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7 0−1
Elden Ring 7−8 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1
World of Tanks 40−45 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 16−18 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 19 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Valorant 6−7 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.07 0.01
Recency 7 January 2020 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 60600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while Radeon 9000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
ATI Radeon 9000
Radeon 9000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 705 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 33 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.