FirePro D300 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with FirePro D300, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
6.05

D300 outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking595457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.734.59
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameVega RenoirPitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)18 January 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed400 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data68.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.176 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1270 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data162.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−42.9%
30−35
+42.9%
1440p23
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
4K18
−50%
27−30
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Atomic Heart 15
−60%
24−27
+60%
Battlefield 5 22
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
Far Cry 5 15
−60%
24−27
+60%
Fortnite 33
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 5 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Valorant 97
−64.9%
160−170
+64.9%
Atomic Heart 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Battlefield 5 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 56
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Dota 2 42
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
Far Cry 5 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
Fortnite 22
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−60%
24−27
+60%
Metro Exodus 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
Valorant 73
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Battlefield 5 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 40
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Far Cry 5 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Valorant 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Fortnite 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Valorant 49
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Fortnite 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Atomic Heart 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Valorant 22
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Fortnite 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and FirePro D300 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D300 is 43% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro D300 is 52% faster in 1440p
  • FirePro D300 is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.05 10.02
Recency 7 January 2020 18 January 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

FirePro D300, on the other hand, has a 65.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The FirePro D300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while FirePro D300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4
712 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9
30 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or FirePro D300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.