Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking770not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.89no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeRaven
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384704
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1251 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate40.8055.04
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 19 April 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has 133.3% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 11 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 70 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.