Radeon RX 6600 XT vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) with Radeon RX 6600 XT, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2018
15 Watt
3.04

RX 6600 XT outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by a whopping 1310% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking77091
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.01
Power efficiency13.8918.37
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed300 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate40.80331.4
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.21.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3.04
RX 6600 XT 42.87
+1310%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 1173
RX 6600 XT 16519
+1308%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2991
RX 6600 XT 39051
+1206%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8189
RX 6600 XT 88163
+977%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2245
RX 6600 XT 28342
+1162%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 16787
RX 6600 XT 156297
+831%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 94451
RX 6600 XT 472371
+400%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−800%
135
+800%
1440p5−6
−1400%
75
+1400%
4K3−4
−1367%
44
+1367%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.81
1440pno data5.05
4Kno data8.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1217%
79
+1217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
−1513%
129
+1513%
Battlefield 5 11
−1145%
130−140
+1145%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8
−975%
85−90
+975%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1200%
78
+1200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1417%
90−95
+1417%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1213%
100−110
+1213%
Forza Horizon 4 18
−1006%
190−200
+1006%
Hitman 3 7
−1443%
108
+1443%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−657%
170−180
+657%
Metro Exodus 13
−923%
130−140
+923%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10
−870%
95−100
+870%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−1225%
150−160
+1225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−241%
130−140
+241%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9
−900%
90−95
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
−1414%
106
+1414%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−2640%
130−140
+2640%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1129%
85−90
+1129%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1167%
76
+1167%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1417%
90−95
+1417%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1213%
100−110
+1213%
Forza Horizon 4 15
−1227%
190−200
+1227%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1250%
108
+1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−657%
170−180
+657%
Metro Exodus 5
−2560%
130−140
+2560%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1286%
95−100
+1286%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−1393%
209
+1393%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−418%
85−90
+418%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−241%
130−140
+241%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7400%
75
+7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1129%
85−90
+1129%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1050%
69
+1050%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1417%
90−95
+1417%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1144%
190−200
+1144%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1150%
100
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−583%
157
+583%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−1425%
183
+1425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−1550%
99
+1550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−56.4%
61
+56.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1286%
95−100
+1286%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
Hitman 3 8−9
−738%
67
+738%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1350%
116
+1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3100%
60−65
+3100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−1022%
200−210
+1022%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118
+0%
118
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 33
+0%
33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+0%
61
+0%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 800% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 1400% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 1367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 7400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 42.87
Recency 7 January 2018 30 July 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 160 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has 966.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 1310.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 70 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4338 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.