Radeon HD 7400G vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon HD 7400G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2018
15 Watt
3.05
+342%

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms HD 7400G by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7831186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.942.78
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeScrapper
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed300 MHz327 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz424 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rate40.805.088
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.1628 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3.05
+342%
HD 7400G 0.69

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 1173
+339%
HD 7400G 267

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2991
+621%
HD 7400G 415

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2245
+587%
HD 7400G 327

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 16787
+593%
HD 7400G 2424

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+400%
3−4
−400%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
Atomic Heart 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 19
+375%
4−5
−375%
Forza Horizon 4 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Valorant 45−50
+58.6%
27−30
−58.6%
Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 32
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 38
+217%
12−14
−217%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Metro Exodus 3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Valorant 45−50
+58.6%
27−30
−58.6%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 31
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 45−50
+58.6%
27−30
−58.6%
Fortnite 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Valorant 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and HD 7400G compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) surpassed HD 7400G in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.05 0.69
Recency 7 January 2018 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 17 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has a 342% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7400G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
AMD Radeon HD 7400G
Radeon HD 7400G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5
72 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7
93 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or Radeon HD 7400G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.