GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 with GeForce4 Ti 4200, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
3.99
+39800%

RX Vega 5 outperforms GeForce4 Ti 4200 by a whopping 39800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6671521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.11no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameVegaNV25 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)6 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speedno data250 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data63 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data2.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_18.1
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 43 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 11 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 22 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 29 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 15 0−1
Fortnite 52 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 17 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 39 0−1
Far Cry 5 12 0−1
Fortnite 21 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 15 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 13 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
Metro Exodus 4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 37 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.99 0.01
Recency 7 January 2020 6 February 2002
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm

RX Vega 5 has a 39800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook card while GeForce4 Ti 4200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
GeForce4 Ti 4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 225 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 42 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or GeForce4 Ti 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.