GeForce GT 710 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 with GeForce GT 710, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.65
+185%

RX Vega 5 outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking651955
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiency21.255.88
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameVegaGK208
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320192
Core clock speedno data954 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data915 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rateno data15.26
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision-+
PureVideo-+
PhysX-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 5 4.65
+185%
GT 710 1.63

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 5 2438
+157%
GT 710 947

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 5 18282
+151%
GT 710 7270

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 5 128628
+82.6%
GT 710 70459

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+125%
8
−125%
1440p10−12
+150%
4
−150%
4K16−18
+167%
6
−167%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.37
1440pno data8.75
4Kno data5.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9
+125%
4−5
−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
+200%
4−5
−200%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Hitman 3 8
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Metro Exodus 20
+186%
7−8
−186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Metro Exodus 15
+200%
5−6
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+367%
3−4
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+240%
5
−240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+180%
5
−180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+200%
3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12
+300%
3−4
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
+0%
5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
+0%
5
+0%

This is how RX Vega 5 and GT 710 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is 125% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 5 is 150% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 5 is 167% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 5 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is ahead in 51 test (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.65 1.63
Recency 7 January 2020 27 March 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 19 Watt

RX Vega 5 has a 185.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 214 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4319 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.