GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon RX Vega 5

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 with GeForce 9800 GTX, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.43
+132%

RX Vega 5 outperforms 9800 GTX by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking656901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.09
Power efficiency21.300.98
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVegaG92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)28 March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320128
Core clock speedno data675 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data754 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt140 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data43.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4321 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data70.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataHDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-Via Adapter
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+138%
8−9
−138%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data37.38

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+200%
3−4
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+133%
9−10
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+157%
7−8
−157%
Valorant 18
+157%
7−8
−157%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 21
+133%
9−10
−133%
Far Cry 5 21
+133%
9−10
−133%
Fortnite 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+156%
16−18
−156%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Valorant 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
World of Tanks 50
+138%
21−24
−138%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Valorant 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
World of Tanks 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Valorant 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Fortnite 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Valorant 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

This is how RX Vega 5 and 9800 GTX compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is 138% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 1.91
Recency 7 January 2020 28 March 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 140 Watt

RX Vega 5 has a 131.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 833.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook card while GeForce 9800 GTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 218 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 190 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.