Radeon R9 M360 vs RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 10 and Radeon R9 M360, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 10
2019
10 Watt
4.24

R9 M360 outperforms RX Vega 10 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking685651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.19no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameRavenTropo
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Compute unitsno data8
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate52.0429.60
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.0Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 10 4.24
R9 M360 4.72
+11.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 10 1631
R9 M360 1813
+11.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Elden Ring 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Valorant 22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Fortnite 15
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 48
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
World of Tanks 42
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 29
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Far Cry 5 19
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Elden Ring 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
World of Tanks 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how RX Vega 10 and R9 M360 compete in popular games:

  • R9 M360 is 6% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.24 4.72
Recency 8 January 2019 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R9 M360, on the other hand, has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon R9 M360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
AMD Radeon R9 M360
Radeon R9 M360

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1077 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 143 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.