Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs RX Vega 10

Place in the ranking	685	104
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	6.69
Power efficiency	29.19	6.96
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Raven	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	8 January 2019 (6 years ago)	3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	3840
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1301 MHz	1967 MHz
Number of transistors	4,940 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	400 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.04	472.1
Floating-point processing power	1.665 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	96
TMUs	40	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	Apple MPX
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	32 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 10 4.24

Pro W6800X Duo 40.47
+854%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 10 1631

Pro W6800X Duo 15556
+854%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−841%

160−170
+841%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

31.24

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9 −844%	85−90 +844%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 −817%	110−120 +817%
Elden Ring	11 −809%	100−105 +809%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	11 −809%	100−105 +809%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 −829%	65−70 +829%
Forza Horizon 4	17 −841%	160−170 +841%
Metro Exodus	12 −817%	110−120 +817%
Red Dead Redemption 2	19 −847%	180−190 +847%
Valorant	22 −809%	200−210 +809%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16 −838%	150−160 +838%
Counter-Strike 2	7 −829%	65−70 +829%
Cyberpunk 2077	2 −800%	18−20 +800%
Dota 2	18 −844%	170−180 +844%
Elden Ring	7 −829%	65−70 +829%
Far Cry 5	17 −841%	160−170 +841%
Fortnite	15 −833%	140−150 +833%
Forza Horizon 4	14 −829%	130−140 +829%
Grand Theft Auto V	10 −850%	95−100 +850%
Metro Exodus	6 −817%	55−60 +817%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	48 −838%	450−500 +838%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −829%	130−140 +829%
Valorant	8−9 −838%	75−80 +838%
World of Tanks	42 −852%	400−450 +852%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −844%	85−90 +844%
Dota 2	29 −831%	270−280 +831%
Far Cry 5	19 −847%	180−190 +847%
Forza Horizon 4	12 −817%	110−120 +817%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −846%	350−400 +846%
Valorant	8−9 −838%	75−80 +838%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Elden Ring	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −831%	270−280 +831%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
World of Tanks	30−33 −833%	280−290 +833%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −844%	85−90 +844%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −844%	85−90 +844%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Valorant	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −838%	150−160 +838%
Elden Ring	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −838%	150−160 +838%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −838%	150−160 +838%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Dota 2	16−18 −838%	150−160 +838%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Fortnite	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Valorant	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%

This is how RX Vega 10 and Pro W6800X Duo compete in popular games:

Pro W6800X Duo is 841% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.24	40.47
Recency	8 January 2019	3 August 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	400 Watt

RX Vega 10 has 3900% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X Duo, on the other hand, has a 854.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.