Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs Radeon RX Vega 10

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 10 with Iris Plus Graphics 950, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 10
2019
10 Watt
4.24

Iris Plus Graphics 950 outperforms RX Vega 10 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking685573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.1930.06
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRavenIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate52.0432.00
Floating-point processing power1.665 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 10 4.24
Iris Plus Graphics 950 6.55
+54.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 10 1631
Iris Plus Graphics 950 2519
+54.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Elden Ring 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Metro Exodus 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Valorant 22
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 2
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 18
−50%
27−30
+50%
Elden Ring 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Fortnite 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Metro Exodus 6
−50%
9−10
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 48
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
World of Tanks 42
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Dota 2 29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Far Cry 5 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Valorant 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Elden Ring 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
World of Tanks 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Valorant 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Elden Ring 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Valorant 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

This is how RX Vega 10 and Iris Plus Graphics 950 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics 950 is 41% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.24 6.55
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 10 has 50% lower power consumption.

Iris Plus Graphics 950, on the other hand, has a 54.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics 950 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1077 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.