Radeon RX 6500 vs RX 8060S
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 8060S and Radeon RX 6500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8060S outperforms RX 6500 by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 118 | 335 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 40 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 103
+129%
| 45−50
−129%
|
| 1440p | 51
+143%
| 21−24
−143%
|
| 4K | 35
+150%
| 14−16
−150%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+124%
|
100−105
−124%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+140%
|
40−45
−140%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 110−120
+122%
|
50−55
−122%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+75.6%
|
75−80
−75.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 215
+126%
|
95−100
−126%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+140%
|
40−45
−140%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 96
+57.4%
|
60−65
−57.4%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+77.8%
|
95−100
−77.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+107%
|
75−80
−107%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130
+119%
|
55−60
−119%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+124%
|
70−75
−124%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+65.5%
|
140−150
−65.5%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+75.6%
|
75−80
−75.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 109
+142%
|
45−50
−142%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+22.4%
|
220−230
−22.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+140%
|
40−45
−140%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 95
+55.7%
|
60−65
−55.7%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+77.8%
|
95−100
−77.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+107%
|
75−80
−107%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130
+119%
|
55−60
−119%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 127
+84.1%
|
65−70
−84.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 95−100
+145%
|
40−45
−145%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+124%
|
70−75
−124%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 140−150
+185%
|
50−55
−185%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+65.5%
|
140−150
−65.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+75.6%
|
75−80
−75.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+140%
|
40−45
−140%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 92
+50.8%
|
60−65
−50.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+107%
|
75−80
−107%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+124%
|
70−75
−124%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 101
+94.2%
|
50−55
−94.2%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 170−180
+77.8%
|
95−100
−77.8%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 71
+137%
|
30−33
−137%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 280−290
+113%
|
130−140
−113%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 70
+119%
|
30−35
−119%
|
| Metro Exodus | 60−65
+150%
|
24−27
−150%
|
| Valorant | 260−270
+50.6%
|
170−180
−50.6%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+94.3%
|
50−55
−94.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+133%
|
21−24
−133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−105
+138%
|
40−45
−138%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+157%
|
45−50
−157%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 75−80
+126%
|
35−40
−126%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 100−110
+153%
|
40−45
−153%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 36
+125%
|
16−18
−125%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 76
+124%
|
30−35
−124%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+153%
|
14−16
−153%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
+144%
|
27−30
−144%
|
| Valorant | 240−250
+135%
|
100−110
−135%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+132%
|
27−30
−132%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+144%
|
9−10
−144%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
+162%
|
21−24
−162%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+147%
|
30−35
−147%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+200%
|
18−20
−200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 50−55
+184%
|
18−20
−184%
|
Full HD
High
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
This is how RX 8060S and RX 6500 compete in popular games:
- RX 8060S is 129% faster in 1080p
- RX 8060S is 143% faster in 1440p
- RX 8060S is 150% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 8060S is 200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 8060S performs better in 41 tests (93%)
- there's a draw in 3 tests (7%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
