Radeon Pro VII vs RX 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5500M 5600M 6550M 6600M 6800M 7600M 7600M XT 7700S 7900M 8040S 8050S 8060S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI50 Instinct MI60 Pro Vega II Pro Vega II Duo Pro VII

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 8060S with Radeon Pro VII, including specs and performance data.

RX 8060S
2025
40.46
+26.2%

8060S outperforms Pro VII by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 8060S RX 8060S
Pro VII Pro VII

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.31
Power efficiencyno data9.88
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataVega 20
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)13 May 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores403840
Core clock speedno data1400 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,230 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data408.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.06 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data240
L1 Cacheno data960 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1024 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+28.8%
80−85
−28.8%
1440p51
+27.5%
40−45
−27.5%
4K35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data23.74
1440pno data47.48
4Kno data70.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+31.8%
170−180
−31.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+28%
75−80
−28%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120
+30.6%
85−90
−30.6%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+37%
100−105
−37%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+26.5%
170−180
−26.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+28%
75−80
−28%
Far Cry 5 96
+28%
75−80
−28%
Fortnite 170−180
+35.4%
130−140
−35.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+30.8%
120−130
−30.8%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+29%
100−105
−29%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+32.5%
120−130
−32.5%
Valorant 230−240
+30.6%
180−190
−30.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+37%
100−105
−37%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+28.2%
85−90
−28.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+26.8%
220−230
−26.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+28%
75−80
−28%
Far Cry 5 95
+26.7%
75−80
−26.7%
Fortnite 170−180
+35.4%
130−140
−35.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+30.8%
120−130
−30.8%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+29%
100−105
−29%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+27%
100−105
−27%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+30.7%
75−80
−30.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+32.5%
120−130
−32.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+34.5%
110−120
−34.5%
Valorant 230−240
+30.6%
180−190
−30.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+37%
100−105
−37%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+28%
75−80
−28%
Far Cry 5 92
+31.4%
70−75
−31.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+30.8%
120−130
−30.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+32.5%
120−130
−32.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
+26.3%
80−85
−26.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+35.4%
130−140
−35.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 71
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+30.9%
220−230
−30.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Valorant 260−270
+26.2%
210−220
−26.2%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+28.8%
80−85
−28.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+33.3%
75−80
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+31.1%
90−95
−31.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+28.2%
85−90
−28.2%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+26.7%
60−65
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+32%
50−55
−32%
Valorant 240−250
+31.1%
190−200
−31.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+30%
50−55
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%

This is how RX 8060S and Pro VII compete in popular games:

  • RX 8060S is 29% faster in 1080p
  • RX 8060S is 28% faster in 1440p
  • RX 8060S is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 40.46 32.07
Recency 6 January 2025 13 May 2020

RX 8060S has a 26% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The Radeon RX 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro VII in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 8060S Radeon RX 8060S
vs
RTX 5060 Mobile GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
vs
L20 L20
RX 8060S Radeon RX 8060S
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
RX 8060S Radeon RX 8060S
vs
PlayStation 4 GPU 4 GPU
RX 8060S Radeon RX 8060S
vs
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
RX 8060S Radeon RX 8060S
vs
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100
RX 8060S Radeon RX 8060S
vs
R7 240 OEM R7 240 OEM
RX 560X Radeon RX 560X
vs
RX 8060S RX 8060S
Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU M4 Max 32-Core GPU
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
Arc Graphics 140T Arc Graphics 140T
vs
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
R6 M340DX R6 M340DX
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
HD 8570A HD 8570A
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
R6 M435DX R6 M435DX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 1952 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 8060S or Radeon Pro VII, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.