Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs Radeon RX 7900M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 35 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 22.97 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Navi 31 | Phoenix |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $699 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4608 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2090 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 57,700 million | 25,390 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 601.9 | 129.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 38.52 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 192 | 32 |
| TMUs | 288 | 48 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | no data | 280 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x USB Type-C |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 13 June 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 30 Watt |
RX 7900M has an age advantage of 4 months.
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7900M and Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook card while Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
