Radeon RX 7800M vs RX 7900M

Place in the ranking	33	156
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.99	13.05
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 31	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	19 October 2023 (1 year ago)	11 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	3840
Core clock speed	1825 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	2090 MHz	2335 MHz
Number of transistors	57,700 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	180 Watt
Texture fill rate	601.9	560.4
Floating-point processing power	38.52 TFLOPS	35.87 TFLOPS
ROPs	192	96
TMUs	288	240
Ray Tracing Cores	72	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	576.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900M 60.12
+76.2%

RX 7800M 34.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900M 23115
+76.2%

RX 7800M 13117

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	158 +85.9%	85−90 −85.9%
1440p	116 +78.5%	65−70 −78.5%
4K	92 +84%	50−55 −84%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	140−150 +86.7%	75−80 −86.7%
Elden Ring	220−230 +88.3%	120−130 −88.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +80%	65−70 −80%
Counter-Strike 2	140−150 +86.7%	75−80 −86.7%
Forza Horizon 4	300−350 +80.6%	180−190 −80.6%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +81.4%	70−75 −81.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +83.3%	60−65 −83.3%
Valorant	270−280 +81.3%	150−160 −81.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +80%	65−70 −80%
Counter-Strike 2	131 +87.1%	70−75 −87.1%
Dota 2	139 +85.3%	75−80 −85.3%
Elden Ring	220−230 +88.3%	120−130 −88.3%
Far Cry 5	84 +86.7%	45−50 −86.7%
Fortnite	230−240 +81.5%	130−140 −81.5%
Forza Horizon 4	300−350 +80.6%	180−190 −80.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	139 +85.3%	75−80 −85.3%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +81.4%	70−75 −81.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +79.2%	120−130 −79.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +83.3%	60−65 −83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +83.2%	95−100 −83.2%
Valorant	270−280 +81.3%	150−160 −81.3%
World of Tanks	270−280 +86%	150−160 −86%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +80%	65−70 −80%
Counter-Strike 2	130 +85.7%	70−75 −85.7%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +83.1%	65−70 −83.1%
Forza Horizon 4	344 +81.1%	190−200 −81.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +79.2%	120−130 −79.2%
Valorant	270−280 +81.3%	150−160 −81.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	106 +76.7%	60−65 −76.7%
Elden Ring	140−150 +83.8%	80−85 −83.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	106 +76.7%	60−65 −76.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +84.2%	95−100 −84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +100%	35−40 −100%
World of Tanks	350−400 +80.5%	220−230 −80.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +93.3%	45−50 −93.3%
Counter-Strike 2	85 +88.9%	45−50 −88.9%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +77.8%	90−95 −77.8%
Forza Horizon 4	249 +77.9%	140−150 −77.9%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +78.5%	65−70 −78.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +78.6%	70−75 −78.6%
Valorant	230−240 +81.5%	130−140 −81.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +77.5%	40−45 −77.5%
Dota 2	146 +82.5%	80−85 −82.5%
Elden Ring	75−80 +90%	40−45 −90%
Grand Theft Auto V	146 +82.5%	80−85 −82.5%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +90%	30−33 −90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +90%	110−120 −90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	146 +82.5%	80−85 −82.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +92.5%	40−45 −92.5%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +77.5%	40−45 −77.5%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +90.9%	55−60 −90.9%
Fortnite	95−100 +92%	50−55 −92%
Forza Horizon 4	131 +87.1%	70−75 −87.1%
Valorant	130−140 +77.3%	75−80 −77.3%