P30PH vs Radeon RX 7900 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.55no data
Power efficiency17.38no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 31Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 November 2022 (2 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores53762048
Core clock speed1387 MHz1120 MHz
Boost clock speed2394 MHz1206 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate804.4154.4
Floating-point processing power51.48 TFLOPS4.94 TFLOPS
ROPs19232
TMUs336128
Ray Tracing Cores84no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length276 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount20 GB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz2100 MHz
Memory bandwidth800.0 GB/s268.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.0b
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 20 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 180 Watt

RX 7900 XT has a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

P30PH, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7900 XT and P30PH. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT
AMD P30PH
P30PH

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1730 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 6 votes

Rate P30PH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.