Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded vs RX 7800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.81no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 32Raven
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 September 2024 (1 year ago)19 April 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840704
Core clock speed1295 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2335 MHz1251 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate560.455.04
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPS1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs24044
Ray Tracing Cores60no data
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data
L3 Cache48 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2024 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

RX 7800M has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega 11 Embedded, on the other hand, has 414% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800M and Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.