Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Radeon RX 7800M

Radeon RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600S Radeon RX 7700S Radeon RX 7800M Radeon RX 7900M
VS
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7800M and Arc 8-Core iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7800M
2024
12 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
22.95
+44.1%

RX 7800M outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX 7800M RX 7800M
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking217311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.07no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNavi 32Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 September 2024 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38408
Core clock speed1295 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2335 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Wattno data
Texture fill rate560.4no data
Floating-point processing power35.87 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs240no data
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+38.9%
36
−38.9%
1440p24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%
4K18−21
+28.6%
14
−28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40
+0%
40
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 28
+0%
28
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+0%
24
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RX 7800M and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800M is 39% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800M is 41% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800M is 29% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 22.95 15.93
Recency 11 September 2024 14 December 2023

RX 7800M has a 44.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The Radeon RX 7800M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
ROG Ally GPU ROG Ally GPU
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
ROG Ally GPU ROG Ally GPU
RTX 5070 Ti GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
vs
Apple M4 32-core GPU M4 32 core GPU
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
vs
HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 620
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
vs
7600 GS GeForce 7600 GS
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
HD 6250 Radeon HD 6250
vs
6700 XL GeForce 6700 XL
ATI Mobility HD 3850 Mobility Radeon HD 3850
vs
Go 7900 GTX GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GT 230M GeForce GT 230M
vs
Radeon E6465 Radeon E6465
R5 M315 Radeon R5 M315
vs
GeForce 800M GeForce 800M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 64 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7800M or Arc 8-Core iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.