Radeon PRO W7900 vs RX 7800 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7800 XT with Radeon PRO W7900, including specs and performance data.

RX 7800 XT
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 263 Watt
63.08

PRO W7900 outperforms RX 7800 XT by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3012
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.8616.63
Power efficiency16.6017.92
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 32Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 308% better value for money than PRO W7900.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38406144
Core clock speed1295 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed2430 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)263 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate583.2958.1
Floating-point processing power37.32 TFLOPS61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs96192
TMUs240384
Ray Tracing Cores6096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm280 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2438 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.1 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.13x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7800 XT 63.08
PRO W7900 76.36
+21.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7800 XT 24332
PRO W7900 29456
+21.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD218
−19.3%
260−270
+19.3%
1440p122
−14.8%
140−150
+14.8%
4K73
−16.4%
85−90
+16.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.2915.38
1440p4.0928.56
4K6.8447.05

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 258
−16.3%
300−310
+16.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 178
−18%
210−220
+18%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 222
−17.1%
260−270
+17.1%
Battlefield 5 190−200
−20.6%
240−250
+20.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−14%
130−140
+14%
Cyberpunk 2077 193
−19.2%
230−240
+19.2%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−15%
130−140
+15%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
−19.2%
180−190
+19.2%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−17.4%
270−280
+17.4%
Hitman 3 120−130
−21%
150−160
+21%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
−20.2%
280−290
+20.2%
Metro Exodus 150−160
−16.1%
180−190
+16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−18.6%
140−150
+18.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 250−260
−17.2%
300−310
+17.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
−20%
180−190
+20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 261
−14.9%
300−310
+14.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 181
−16%
210−220
+16%
Battlefield 5 190−200
−20.6%
240−250
+20.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−14%
130−140
+14%
Cyberpunk 2077 161
−18%
190−200
+18%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−15%
130−140
+15%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
−19.2%
180−190
+19.2%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−17.4%
270−280
+17.4%
Hitman 3 120−130
−21%
150−160
+21%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
−20.2%
280−290
+20.2%
Metro Exodus 150−160
−16.1%
180−190
+16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−18.6%
140−150
+18.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 398
−13.1%
450−500
+13.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
−13.6%
150−160
+13.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
−20%
180−190
+20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130
−15.4%
150−160
+15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 158
−20.3%
190−200
+20.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−14%
130−140
+14%
Cyberpunk 2077 148
−14.9%
170−180
+14.9%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−15%
130−140
+15%
Forza Horizon 4 222
−17.1%
260−270
+17.1%
Hitman 3 120−130
−21%
150−160
+21%
Horizon Zero Dawn 274
−9.5%
300−310
+9.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 340
−17.6%
400−450
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200
−20%
240−250
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 145
−17.2%
170−180
+17.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−18.6%
140−150
+18.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
−14.3%
160−170
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−12.2%
110−120
+12.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 119
−17.6%
140−150
+17.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 124
−21%
150−160
+21%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−14.9%
85−90
+14.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 97
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−16.4%
85−90
+16.4%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
−10.7%
300−310
+10.7%
Hitman 3 90−95
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 217
−19.8%
260−270
+19.8%
Metro Exodus 148
−14.9%
170−180
+14.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 243
−19.3%
290−300
+19.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
−15.6%
170−180
+15.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
−19.1%
280−290
+19.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−16.4%
85−90
+16.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%
Hitman 3 50−55
−20.4%
65−70
+20.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−16.6%
260−270
+16.6%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−17%
110−120
+17%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
−18.6%
140−150
+18.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 89
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Forza Horizon 4 164
−15.9%
190−200
+15.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
−15.4%
150−160
+15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 67
−19.4%
80−85
+19.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−17.2%
75−80
+17.2%

This is how RX 7800 XT and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 19% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7900 is 15% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7900 is 16% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.08 76.36
Recency 25 August 2023 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 263 Watt 295 Watt

RX 7800 XT has an age advantage of 4 months, and 12.2% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has a 21.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7800 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2714 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 73 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.