RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 7800 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30not rated
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.95no data
Power efficiency16.73no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 32AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38405120
Core clock speed1295 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speed2430 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)263 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate583.2360.0
Floating-point processing power37.32 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Cores6040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2438 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.1 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1No outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2023 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 263 Watt 100 Watt

RX 7800 XT has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has 163% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7800 XT and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop card while RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2788 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.