Radeon 760M vs RX 7600S

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600S and Radeon 760M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7600S
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
38.76
+162%

RX 7600S outperforms 760M by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking120356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.5868.01
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33Hawx Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2023 (2 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792512
Core clock speed1500 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate246.483.17
Floating-point processing power15.77 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs11232
Ray Tracing Cores288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600S 38.76
+162%
Radeon 760M 14.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600S 14901
+162%
Radeon 760M 5696

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600S 34218
+256%
Radeon 760M 9603

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7600S 79339
+141%
Radeon 760M 32985

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600S 25900
+322%
Radeon 760M 6142

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7600S 155806
+273%
Radeon 760M 41767

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 7600S 9203
+335%
Radeon 760M 2116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100
+223%
31
−223%
1440p46
+142%
19
−142%
4K26
+189%
9−10
−189%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 99
+296%
25
−296%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+177%
30
−177%
Elden Ring 130−140
+200%
45−50
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+117%
45−50
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+337%
19
−337%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+333%
12
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 228
+347%
51
−347%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+127%
40−45
−127%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+111%
35−40
−111%
Valorant 209
+254%
55−60
−254%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+117%
45−50
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+317%
18
−317%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+367%
9
−367%
Dota 2 122
+430%
23
−430%
Elden Ring 145
+222%
45−50
−222%
Far Cry 5 56
+93.1%
29
−93.1%
Fortnite 170−180
+105%
80−85
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 190
+332%
44
−332%
Grand Theft Auto V 126
+271%
34
−271%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+127%
40−45
−127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+86%
100−110
−86%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+111%
35−40
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+204%
45−50
−204%
Valorant 150−160
+163%
55−60
−163%
World of Tanks 270−280
+45.3%
190−200
−45.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+117%
45−50
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 56
+115%
24−27
−115%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+20.7%
27−30
−20.7%
Dota 2 110
+108%
50−55
−108%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+74.5%
55−60
−74.5%
Forza Horizon 4 163
+341%
37
−341%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+86%
100−110
−86%
Valorant 179
+203%
55−60
−203%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75
+238%
21−24
−238%
Elden Ring 76
+230%
21−24
−230%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+227%
21−24
−227%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+33.6%
130−140
−33.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
World of Tanks 240−250
+136%
100−110
−136%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+247%
35−40
−247%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+208%
35−40
−208%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+163%
30−35
−163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+253%
18−20
−253%
Valorant 120−130
+227%
35−40
−227%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Dota 2 75−80
+192%
24−27
−192%
Elden Ring 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+192%
24−27
−192%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+184%
40−45
−184%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+192%
24−27
−192%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+221%
14−16
−221%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Dota 2 75−80
+192%
24−27
−192%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+200%
18−20
−200%
Fortnite 55−60
+224%
16−18
−224%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+205%
21−24
−205%
Valorant 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%

This is how RX 7600S and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600S is 223% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600S is 142% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600S is 189% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600S is 430% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7600S surpassed Radeon 760M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.76 14.82
Recency 4 January 2023 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

RX 7600S has a 161.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Radeon RX 7600S
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 219 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 215 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.