Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs RX 7600M

Place in the ranking	443	54
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	86.70
Power efficiency	7.84	14.11
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 33	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)	17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$334

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	2560
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	2410 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	269.9	413.0
Floating-point processing power	17.27 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112	160
Ray Tracing Cores	28	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M 10.25

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 51.26
+400%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M 3940

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 19705
+400%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	80 −400%	400−450 +400%
1440p	31 −384%	150−160 +384%
4K	23 −378%	110−120 +378%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	0.84
1440p	no data	2.23
4K	no data	3.04

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	83 −382%	400−450 +382%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Elden Ring	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −385%	160−170 +385%
Counter-Strike 2	71 −393%	350−400 +393%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	218 −382%	1050−1100 +382%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −381%	130−140 +381%
Valorant	35−40 −400%	190−200 +400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −385%	160−170 +385%
Counter-Strike 2	62 −384%	300−310 +384%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Dota 2	74 −373%	350−400 +373%
Elden Ring	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%
Far Cry 5	62 −384%	300−310 +384%
Fortnite	60−65 −400%	300−310 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	185 −386%	900−950 +386%
Grand Theft Auto V	111 −395%	550−600 +395%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −343%	350−400 +343%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −381%	130−140 +381%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −384%	150−160 +384%
Valorant	35−40 −400%	190−200 +400%
World of Tanks	140−150 −376%	700−750 +376%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −385%	160−170 +385%
Counter-Strike 2	47 −389%	230−240 +389%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Dota 2	35−40 −386%	180−190 +386%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −400%	210−220 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	157 −378%	750−800 +378%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −343%	350−400 +343%
Valorant	35−40 −400%	190−200 +400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Elden Ring	14−16 −400%	70−75 +400%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −390%	240−250 +390%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
World of Tanks	70−75 −379%	350−400 +379%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Counter-Strike 2	21 −376%	100−105 +376%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −400%	110−120 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −378%	110−120 +378%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Valorant	24−27 −380%	120−130 +380%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Dota 2	21−24 −376%	100−105 +376%
Elden Ring	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −400%	150−160 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −400%	100−105 +400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Dota 2	21−24 −376%	100−105 +376%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Fortnite	10−12 −400%	55−60 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −400%	65−70 +400%
Valorant	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%

This is how RX 7600M and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB compete in popular games:

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 400% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 384% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 378% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.25	51.26
Recency	4 January 2023	17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	250 Watt

RX 7600M has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 400.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.