Quadro NVS 285 vs Radeon RX 7600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking88not rated
Place by popularity86not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.34no data
Power efficiency17.95no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 33NV44 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)6 June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 $27.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1720 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate339.81.100
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1284
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length204 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.11x DMS-59
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.73.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 16535
+39269%
NVS 285 42

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2023 6 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 6 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 18 Watt

RX 7600 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 285, on the other hand, has 816.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7600 and Quadro NVS 285. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 285 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Quadro NVS 285

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1789 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.