Quadro FX 470 vs Radeon RX 7600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking87not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.82no data
Power efficiency17.87no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 33C79
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)12 September 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816
Core clock speed1720 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed2655 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,300 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt38 Watt
Texture fill rate339.84.640
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1288
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCI
Length204 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.12x DVI
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.2N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2023 12 September 2007
Chip lithography 6 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 38 Watt

RX 7600 has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 470, on the other hand, has 334.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 7600 and Quadro FX 470. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7600 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 470 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
Quadro FX 470

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1934 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.