RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 6950 XT

Place in the ranking	15	31
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	27.08	no data
Power efficiency	15.08	19.18
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 21	DG2-512
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	10 May 2022 (2 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,099	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	4096
Core clock speed	1925 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	2324 MHz	1680 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	335 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	743.7	no data
Floating-point processing power	23.8 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	128	no data
TMUs	320	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	80	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	3-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	576.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6950 XT 72.96
+17.1%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 62.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6950 XT 28155
+17.1%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 24052

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6950 XT 72228
+39.5%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 51771

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6950 XT 59882
+96.8%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 30422

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

RX 6950 XT 143

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 186
+30%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

RX 6950 XT 188

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 213
+13.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

RX 6950 XT 53

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 300
+467%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

RX 6950 XT 284
+12.5%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 252

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

RX 6950 XT 139

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 199
+42.9%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

RX 6950 XT 77

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 135
+75.1%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

RX 6950 XT 286
+75.7%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 163

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

RX 6950 XT 29

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile 31
+6.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	226 +18.9%	190−200 −18.9%
1440p	140 +27.3%	110−120 −27.3%
4K	85 +21.4%	70−75 −21.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.86	no data
1440p	7.85	no data
4K	12.93	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

161
+23.8%

130−140

−23.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +25.8%	120−130 −25.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +20%	110−120 −20%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +17.5%	200−210 −17.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +20%	100−105 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	143 +19.2%	120−130 −19.2%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +23.2%	95−100 −23.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +20.7%	150−160 −20.7%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +21%	200−210 −21%
Hitman 3	120−130 +17.3%	110−120 −17.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +20%	220−230 −20%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +19.2%	130−140 −19.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +23%	100−105 −23%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−350 +20.4%	260−270 −20.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +17.7%	130−140 −17.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +25.8%	120−130 −25.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +20%	110−120 −20%
Battlefield 5	230−240 +17.5%	200−210 −17.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +20%	100−105 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	128 +28%	100−105 −28%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +23.2%	95−100 −23.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 +20.7%	150−160 −20.7%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +21%	200−210 −21%
Hitman 3	120−130 +17.3%	110−120 −17.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	260−270 +20%	220−230 −20%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +19.2%	130−140 −19.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +23%	100−105 −23%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	442 +26.3%	350−400 −26.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +22.3%	130−140 −22.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +17.7%	130−140 −17.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +25.8%	120−130 −25.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	130−140 +20%	110−120 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +20%	100−105 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	122 +22%	100−105 −22%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +23.2%	95−100 −23.2%
Forza Horizon 4	240−250 +21%	200−210 −21%
Hitman 3	120−130 +17.3%	110−120 −17.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	318 +17.8%	270−280 −17.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	396 +32%	300−310 −32%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	216 +20%	180−190 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	107 +18.9%	90−95 −18.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130
+23%

100−105

−23%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +18.6%	140−150 −18.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +17.9%	95−100 −17.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +24.3%	70−75 −24.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +17.5%	80−85 −17.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +17.1%	70−75 −17.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	93 +24%	75−80 −24%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +20%	70−75 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +17.8%	230−240 −17.8%
Hitman 3	100−110 +18.9%	90−95 −18.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	255 +21.4%	210−220 −21.4%
Metro Exodus	132 +20%	110−120 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	294 +17.6%	250−260 −17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +22.7%	110−120 −22.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +20%	200−210 −20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120
+18%

100−105

−18%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +17.3%	75−80 −17.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +25.5%	55−60 −25.5%
Hitman 3	65−70 +18.2%	55−60 −18.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +18.9%	190−200 −18.9%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +19%	100−105 −19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	144 +20%	120−130 −20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +22%	50−55 −22%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +18%	50−55 −18%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +30%	40−45 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +25%	40−45 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +20%	110−120 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	172 +22.9%	140−150 −22.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65 +18.2%	55−60 −18.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+17.1%

70−75

−17.1%

This is how RX 6950 XT and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RX 6950 XT is 19% faster in 1080p
RX 6950 XT is 27% faster in 1440p
RX 6950 XT is 21% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	72.96	62.33
Recency	10 May 2022	12 October 2022
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	335 Watt	225 Watt

RX 6950 XT has a 17.1% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 48.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6950 XT is a desktop card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.