A800 SXM4 80 GB vs Radeon RX 6900

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking22not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.66no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)11 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46086912
Core clock speedno data1275 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors23,000 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate606.2609.1
Floating-point processing power19.4 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs64160
TMUs288432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 11 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 80 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 400 Watt

RX 6900 has 56.9% lower power consumption.

A800 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 and A800 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop card while A800 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900
NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB
A800 SXM4 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 82 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate A800 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.