Radeon RX 7600 XT vs RX 6800M

Place in the ranking	148	80
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	76.83
Power efficiency	16.47	16.18
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 22	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2048
Core clock speed	2116 MHz	1980 MHz
Boost clock speed	2390 MHz	2755 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	145 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	382.4	352.6
Floating-point processing power	12.24 TFLOPS	22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160	128
Ray Tracing Cores	40	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	204 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6800M 34.69

RX 7600 XT 44.66
+28.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800M 13335

RX 7600 XT 17169
+28.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	108 −20.4%	130−140 +20.4%
1440p	70 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
4K	46 −19.6%	55−60 +19.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.53
1440p	no data	3.66
4K	no data	5.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	123 −22%	150−160 +22%
Elden Ring	89 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −23.7%	120−130 +23.7%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	104 −25%	130−140 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	232 −25%	290−300 +25%
Metro Exodus	96 −25%	120−130 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	98 −22.4%	120−130 +22.4%
Valorant	130−140 −23.2%	170−180 +23.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −23.7%	120−130 +23.7%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	92 −19.6%	110−120 +19.6%
Dota 2	117 −28.2%	150−160 +28.2%
Elden Ring	172 −27.9%	220−230 +27.9%
Far Cry 5	48 −25%	60−65 +25%
Fortnite	150−160 −27.4%	200−210 +27.4%
Forza Horizon 4	211 −28%	270−280 +28%
Grand Theft Auto V	112 −25%	140−150 +25%
Metro Exodus	87 −26.4%	110−120 +26.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −26.3%	240−250 +26.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	86 −27.9%	110−120 +27.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −26.1%	150−160 +26.1%
Valorant	130−140 −23.2%	170−180 +23.2%
World of Tanks	270−280 −25.9%	350−400 +25.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −23.7%	120−130 +23.7%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	85 −17.6%	100−105 +17.6%
Dota 2	115 −21.7%	140−150 +21.7%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −20.9%	110−120 +20.9%
Forza Horizon 4	180 −27.8%	230−240 +27.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −26.3%	240−250 +26.3%
Valorant	130−140 −23.2%	170−180 +23.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	84 −19%	100−105 +19%
Elden Ring	95 −26.3%	120−130 +26.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	84 −19%	100−105 +19%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −25.7%	220−230 +25.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	53 −22.6%	65−70 +22.6%
World of Tanks	220−230 −26.7%	280−290 +26.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −21.2%	80−85 +21.2%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	49 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −27.3%	140−150 +27.3%
Forza Horizon 4	145 −24.1%	180−190 +24.1%
Metro Exodus	83 −20.5%	100−105 +20.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −22.8%	70−75 +22.8%
Valorant	100−110 −26.2%	130−140 +26.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Dota 2	85 −17.6%	100−105 +17.6%
Elden Ring	44 −25%	55−60 +25%
Grand Theft Auto V	85 −17.6%	100−105 +17.6%
Metro Exodus	38 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −27.3%	140−150 +27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85 −17.6%	100−105 +17.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −28.2%	50−55 +28.2%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Dota 2	95 −26.3%	120−130 +26.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Fortnite	45−50 −27.7%	60−65 +27.7%
Forza Horizon 4	77 −23.4%	95−100 +23.4%
Valorant	50−55 −22.6%	65−70 +22.6%

This is how RX 6800M and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600 XT is 20% faster in 1080p
RX 7600 XT is 29% faster in 1440p
RX 7600 XT is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.69	44.66
Recency	31 May 2021	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	145 Watt	190 Watt

RX 6800M has 31% lower power consumption.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has a 28.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6800M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.