L4 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

Place in the ranking	47	193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	51.13	no data
Power efficiency	14.88	28.64
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 22	AD104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	7424
Core clock speed	2150 MHz	795 MHz
Boost clock speed	2600 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	72 Watt
Texture fill rate	416.0	489.6
Floating-point processing power	13.31 TFLOPS	30.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	160	240
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	40	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	169 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	300.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6750 XT 54.05
+80.4%

L4 29.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6750 XT 20777
+80.4%

L4 11518

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	165 +83.3%	90−95 −83.3%
1440p	87 +93.3%	45−50 −93.3%
4K	51 +88.9%	27−30 −88.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.33	no data
1440p	6.31	no data
4K	10.76	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	166 +84.4%	90−95 −84.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	165 +83.3%	90−95 −83.3%
Elden Ring	197 +97%	100−105 −97%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +95%	60−65 −95%
Counter-Strike 2	130 +85.7%	70−75 −85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	64 +82.9%	35−40 −82.9%
Forza Horizon 4	368 +84%	200−210 −84%
Metro Exodus	150 +87.5%	80−85 −87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +81.8%	55−60 −81.8%
Valorant	230−240 +93.3%	120−130 −93.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +95%	60−65 −95%
Counter-Strike 2	109 +81.7%	60−65 −81.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +100%	27−30 −100%
Dota 2	159 +87.1%	85−90 −87.1%
Elden Ring	66 +88.6%	35−40 −88.6%
Far Cry 5	49 +81.5%	27−30 −81.5%
Fortnite	210−220 +96.4%	110−120 −96.4%
Forza Horizon 4	304 +90%	160−170 −90%
Grand Theft Auto V	162 +90.6%	85−90 −90.6%
Metro Exodus	120 +84.6%	65−70 −84.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +95.5%	110−120 −95.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100−105 +81.8%	55−60 −81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +83.2%	95−100 −83.2%
Valorant	230−240 +93.3%	120−130 −93.3%
World of Tanks	270−280 +86%	150−160 −86%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +95%	60−65 −95%
Counter-Strike 2	96 +92%	50−55 −92%
Cyberpunk 2077	49 +81.5%	27−30 −81.5%
Dota 2	131 +87.1%	70−75 −87.1%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +86.7%	60−65 −86.7%
Forza Horizon 4	260 +85.7%	140−150 −85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +95.5%	110−120 −95.5%
Valorant	230−240 +93.3%	120−130 −93.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	106 +92.7%	55−60 −92.7%
Elden Ring	126 +93.8%	65−70 −93.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	106 +92.7%	55−60 −92.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +84.2%	95−100 −84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +100%	30−33 −100%
World of Tanks	300−350 +83.2%	190−200 −83.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +88.9%	45−50 −88.9%
Counter-Strike 2	57 +90%	30−33 −90%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +88.2%	85−90 −88.2%
Forza Horizon 4	186 +86%	100−105 −86%
Metro Exodus	126 +93.8%	65−70 −93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +96.4%	55−60 −96.4%
Valorant	190−200 +80.9%	110−120 −80.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	33 +83.3%	18−20 −83.3%
Dota 2	104 +89.1%	55−60 −89.1%
Elden Ring	59 +96.7%	30−33 −96.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	104 +89.1%	55−60 −89.1%
Metro Exodus	47 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +88%	100−105 −88%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +85.7%	21−24 −85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	104 +89.1%	55−60 −89.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +94.3%	35−40 −94.3%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Dota 2	101 +83.6%	55−60 −83.6%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +86%	50−55 −86%
Fortnite	90−95 +100%	45−50 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	99 +98%	50−55 −98%
Valorant	110−120 +85%	60−65 −85%

This is how RX 6750 XT and L4 compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 83% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 93% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 89% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	54.05	29.96
Recency	3 March 2022	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	72 Watt

RX 6750 XT has a 80.4% higher aggregate performance score.

L4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 247.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the L4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop card while L4 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.