Radeon Pro W6400 vs RX 6700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6700 XT with Radeon Pro W6400, including specs and performance data.

RX 6700 XT
2021
12 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
51.52
+147%

RX 6700 XT outperforms Pro W6400 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking52261
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.28no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 22Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2021 (3 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed2321 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2581 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate413.0111.9
Floating-point performance13.21 gflops3.58 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6700 XT 51.52
+147%
Pro W6400 20.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6700 XT 19873
+147%
Pro W6400 8033

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD157
+162%
60−65
−162%
1440p88
+151%
35−40
−151%
4K51
+183%
18−21
−183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 119
+164%
45−50
−164%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 169
+160%
65−70
−160%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+152%
65−70
−152%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+150%
40−45
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+148%
40−45
−148%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+150%
50−55
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+153%
85−90
−153%
Hitman 3 138
+151%
55−60
−151%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+151%
80−85
−151%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+167%
55−60
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210
+151%
80−85
−151%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+160%
55−60
−160%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 144
+162%
55−60
−162%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+152%
65−70
−152%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+150%
40−45
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+157%
35−40
−157%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+150%
50−55
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+153%
85−90
−153%
Hitman 3 136
+172%
50−55
−172%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+151%
80−85
−151%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+167%
55−60
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 281
+155%
110−120
−155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+168%
40−45
−168%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+160%
55−60
−160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 125
+150%
50−55
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
+150%
40−45
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 85
+183%
30−33
−183%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+153%
85−90
−153%
Hitman 3 135
+170%
50−55
−170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 193
+157%
75−80
−157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 240
+153%
95−100
−153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127
+154%
50−55
−154%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
+180%
30−33
−180%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+170%
40−45
−170%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+165%
40−45
−165%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 109
+173%
40−45
−173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+154%
24−27
−154%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+167%
21−24
−167%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+161%
100−105
−161%
Hitman 3 83
+177%
30−33
−177%
Horizon Zero Dawn 145
+164%
55−60
−164%
Metro Exodus 123
+173%
45−50
−173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
+166%
65−70
−166%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+159%
85−90
−159%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+154%
35−40
−154%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Hitman 3 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+163%
80−85
−163%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+167%
27−30
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+174%
27−30
−174%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+150%
10−11
−150%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+153%
30−33
−153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93
+166%
35−40
−166%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
+150%
14−16
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%

This is how RX 6700 XT and Pro W6400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 162% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 151% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 183% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.52 20.82
Recency 3 March 2021 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 50 Watt

RX 6700 XT has a 147.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 360% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 6290 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.