GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Radeon RX 6650 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6650 XT with GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6650 XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 176 Watt
44.67
+77.8%

RX 6650 XT outperforms RTX 3050 6GB Mobile by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking80214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation62.60no data
Power efficiency17.4028.71
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2022 (2 years ago)6 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482560
Core clock speed2055 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speed2635 MHz1492 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)176 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate337.3no data
Floating-point processing power10.79 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2190 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6650 XT 44.67
+77.8%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.13

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6650 XT 41739
+140%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 17421

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6650 XT 29796
+149%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 11960

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6650 XT 167944
+132%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 72486

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6650 XT 451929
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 500518
+10.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+91.7%
72
−91.7%
1440p64
+77.8%
36
−77.8%
4K35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.89no data
1440p6.23no data
4K11.40no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 128
+58%
81
−58%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+70.9%
55−60
−70.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+79.1%
40−45
−79.1%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+74.4%
80−85
−74.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+74.5%
50−55
−74.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+68.8%
64
−68.8%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+62.1%
55−60
−62.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+67.7%
65−70
−67.7%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+39%
140−150
−39%
Hitman 3 95−100
+88.2%
50−55
−88.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+57.4%
110−120
−57.4%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+59.3%
85−90
−59.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+53.8%
65−70
−53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+97.6%
85−90
−97.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+32%
100−110
−32%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+70.9%
55−60
−70.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+79.1%
40−45
−79.1%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+74.4%
80−85
−74.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+74.5%
50−55
−74.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+91.3%
46
−91.3%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+62.1%
55−60
−62.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+67.7%
65−70
−67.7%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+39%
140−150
−39%
Hitman 3 95−100
+88.2%
50−55
−88.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+57.4%
110−120
−57.4%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+59.3%
85−90
−59.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+53.8%
65−70
−53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 222
+158%
86
−158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+70.4%
50−55
−70.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+32%
100−110
−32%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+70.9%
55−60
−70.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+79.1%
40−45
−79.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+74.5%
50−55
−74.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+100%
39
−100%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+62.1%
55−60
−62.1%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+39%
140−150
−39%
Hitman 3 95−100
+88.2%
50−55
−88.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 173
+50.4%
110−120
−50.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 193
+154%
76
−154%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+114%
50
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65
−58.5%
100−110
+58.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+53.8%
65−70
−53.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+83.3%
45−50
−83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+81.6%
35−40
−81.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+104%
24−27
−104%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+175%
16−18
−175%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+79.3%
27−30
−79.3%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+68.1%
140−150
−68.1%
Hitman 3 60−65
+100%
30−33
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
+148%
50−55
−148%
Metro Exodus 114
+138%
45−50
−138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124
+118%
57
−118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+83.8%
37
−83.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+46.1%
140−150
−46.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+83.3%
40−45
−83.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+84%
24−27
−84%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
Hitman 3 35−40
+85%
20−22
−85%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+51.9%
120−130
−51.9%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+107%
27−30
−107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+200%
6−7
−200%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+85.3%
30−35
−85.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+106%
30−35
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 23
+109%
10−12
−109%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+86.4%
21−24
−86.4%

This is how RX 6650 XT and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 92% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 78% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 94% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 200% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 58% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.67 25.13
Recency 10 May 2022 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 176 Watt 60 Watt

RX 6650 XT has a 77.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 193.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3410 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 659 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.