UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) vs Radeon RX 6600 XT

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 XT and UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6600 XT
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
36.88
+3953%

RX 6600 XT outperforms UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 3953% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking961112
Place by popularity72not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.12no data
Power efficiency18.297.22
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameNavi 23Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 July 2021 (3 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816
Core clock speed1968 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed2589 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate331.4no data
Floating-point processing power10.6 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Length190 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6600 XT 36.88
+3953%
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) 0.91

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6600 XT 39051
+5908%
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) 650

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6600 XT 28342
+5319%
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) 523

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600 XT 156297
+4055%
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) 3762

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600 XT 472371
+1472%
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) 30044

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+2460%
5
−2460%
1440p71
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
4K41
+4000%
1−2
−4000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.96no data
1440p5.34no data
4K9.24no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+4380%
5−6
−4380%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+3850%
2−3
−3850%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+9100%
1−2
−9100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+4367%
3−4
−4367%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+4380%
5−6
−4380%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+3800%
2−3
−3800%
Far Cry 5 151
+4933%
3−4
−4933%
Fortnite 170−180
+17000%
1−2
−17000%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+2450%
6−7
−2450%
Forza Horizon 5 159
+5200%
3−4
−5200%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+9100%
1−2
−9100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1622%
9−10
−1622%
Valorant 220−230
+639%
30−35
−639%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+4367%
3−4
−4367%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+4380%
5−6
−4380%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1058%
24−27
−1058%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+3700%
2−3
−3700%
Dota 2 170
+2733%
6
−2733%
Far Cry 5 141
+4600%
3−4
−4600%
Fortnite 170−180
+17000%
1−2
−17000%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+2450%
6−7
−2450%
Forza Horizon 5 142
+4633%
3−4
−4633%
Grand Theft Auto V 135
+4400%
3−4
−4400%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+9100%
1−2
−9100%
Metro Exodus 95
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1622%
9−10
−1622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 176
+3420%
5−6
−3420%
Valorant 220−230
+639%
30−35
−639%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+4367%
3−4
−4367%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+3350%
2−3
−3350%
Dota 2 120
+2300%
5
−2300%
Far Cry 5 133
+4333%
3−4
−4333%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+2450%
6−7
−2450%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+9100%
1−2
−9100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+1622%
9−10
−1622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
+1880%
5−6
−1880%
Valorant 220−230
+639%
30−35
−639%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+17000%
1−2
−17000%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+5050%
2−3
−5050%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+5380%
5−6
−5380%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Metro Exodus 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1650%
10−11
−1650%
Valorant 260−270
+25900%
1−2
−25900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+4950%
2−3
−4950%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Far Cry 5 105 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+5600%
2−3
−5600%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+7400%
1−2
−7400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+10400%
1−2
−10400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+327%
14−16
−327%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 0−1
Metro Exodus 34 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Valorant 240−250
+4720%
5−6
−4720%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+6200%
1−2
−6200%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Cyberpunk 2077 14 0−1
Dota 2 86
+4200%
2−3
−4200%
Far Cry 5 51
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+2500%
2−3
−2500%

This is how RX 6600 XT and UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 2460% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 7000% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 4000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 25900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) in all 38 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.88 0.91
Recency 30 July 2021 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 4 Watt

RX 6600 XT has a 3952.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU), on the other hand, has 3900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4657 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6600 XT or UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.