Radeon RX 6950 XT vs RX 6600 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 XT and Radeon RX 6950 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6600 XT
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
42.87

RX 6950 XT outperforms RX 6600 XT by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9117
Place by popularity93not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.0127.15
Power efficiency18.3714.94
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 July 2021 (3 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 $1,099

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 132% better value for money than RX 6950 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20485120
Core clock speed1968 MHz1925 MHz
Boost clock speed2589 MHz2324 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt335 Watt
Texture fill rate331.4743.7
Floating-point processing power10.6 TFLOPS23.8 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs128320
Ray Tracing Cores3280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mm267 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 XT 42.87
RX 6950 XT 73.02
+70.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600 XT 16519
RX 6950 XT 28137
+70.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6600 XT 39051
RX 6950 XT 72228
+85%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6600 XT 88163
RX 6950 XT 119918
+36%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6600 XT 28342
RX 6950 XT 59882
+111%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600 XT 156297
RX 6950 XT 229172
+46.6%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600 XT 472371
RX 6950 XT 497297
+5.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD135
−63%
220
+63%
1440p75
−78.7%
134
+78.7%
4K44
−88.6%
83
+88.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.815.00
1440p5.058.20
4K8.6113.24

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
−104%
161
+104%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
−67.8%
150−160
+67.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 129
−2.3%
130−140
+2.3%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−71.5%
230−240
+71.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−83.3%
143
+83.3%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−28.6%
110−120
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−72.4%
180−190
+72.4%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−21.6%
240−250
+21.6%
Hitman 3 108
−19.4%
120−130
+19.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−51.7%
260−270
+51.7%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−16.5%
150−160
+16.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−26.8%
120−130
+26.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
−96.9%
300−350
+96.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−15%
150−160
+15%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
−67.8%
150−160
+67.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 106
−24.5%
130−140
+24.5%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−71.5%
230−240
+71.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
−68.4%
128
+68.4%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−28.6%
110−120
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
−72.4%
180−190
+72.4%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−21.6%
240−250
+21.6%
Hitman 3 108
−19.4%
120−130
+19.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−51.7%
260−270
+51.7%
Metro Exodus 130−140
−16.5%
150−160
+16.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−26.8%
120−130
+26.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 209
−111%
442
+111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−80.7%
150−160
+80.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−15%
150−160
+15%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
−67.8%
150−160
+67.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
−76%
130−140
+76%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
−76.8%
122
+76.8%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−28.6%
110−120
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−21.6%
240−250
+21.6%
Hitman 3 100
−29%
120−130
+29%
Horizon Zero Dawn 157
−103%
318
+103%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
−116%
396
+116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
−118%
216
+118%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
−75.4%
107
+75.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
−26.8%
120−130
+26.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−100%
160−170
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−72.3%
110−120
+72.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−85.1%
85−90
+85.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
−67.9%
90−95
+67.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−64%
80−85
+64%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−133%
93
+133%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−71.4%
80−85
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
−15.3%
270−280
+15.3%
Hitman 3 67
−59.7%
100−110
+59.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 116
−120%
255
+120%
Metro Exodus 98
−34.7%
132
+34.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118
−149%
294
+149%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−111%
130−140
+111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
−18.8%
240−250
+18.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
−59.5%
110−120
+59.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−105%
85−90
+105%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−86.5%
65−70
+86.5%
Hitman 3 33
−97%
65−70
+97%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
−18.3%
220−230
+18.3%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−113%
110−120
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
−167%
144
+167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−103%
60−65
+103%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
−111%
55−60
+111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−85.7%
50−55
+85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−229%
46
+229%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−120%
130−140
+120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
−182%
172
+182%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24
−171%
65
+171%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−110%
80−85
+110%

This is how RX 6600 XT and RX 6950 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is 63% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6950 XT is 79% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6950 XT is 89% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6950 XT is 229% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6950 XT surpassed RX 6600 XT in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.87 73.02
Recency 30 July 2021 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 335 Watt

RX 6600 XT has 109.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6950 XT, on the other hand, has a 70.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
Radeon RX 6950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4338 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2724 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.