ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs RX 6500M

Place in the ranking	278	1403
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	27.74	0.46
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code name	Navi 24	RV515
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)	2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	no data
Core clock speed	2000 MHz	635 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,400 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	27 Watt
Texture fill rate	153.6	2.540
Floating-point processing power	4.915 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	4
TMUs	64	4
Ray Tracing Cores	16	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	800 MBps
Memory bandwidth	144.0 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.6	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	2.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500M 20.15
+11094%

ATI X1650 SE 0.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500M 7746
+10810%

ATI X1650 SE 71

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	66	0−1
Elden Ring	65	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	39	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	33	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	114 +11300%	1−2 −11300%
Metro Exodus	50−55	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50	0−1
Valorant	101	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	28	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	16	0−1
Dota 2	80	0−1
Elden Ring	55	0−1
Far Cry 5	35	0−1
Fortnite	100−110	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	95	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	69	0−1
Metro Exodus	19	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +13400%	1−2 −13400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65	0−1
Valorant	57	0−1
World of Tanks	230−240 +11550%	2−3 −11550%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	35−40	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	15	0−1
Dota 2	95	0−1
Far Cry 5	65−70	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	83	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +13400%	1−2 −13400%
Valorant	80−85	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35	0−1
Elden Ring	30−35	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +17000%	1−2 −17000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20	0−1
World of Tanks	130−140 +13600%	1−2 −13600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	0−1
Far Cry 5	50−55	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	0−1
Metro Exodus	45−50	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30	0−1
Valorant	50−55	0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Dota 2	30−35	0−1
Elden Ring	14−16	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35	0−1
Metro Exodus	14−16	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Dota 2	30−35	0−1
Far Cry 5	24−27	0−1
Fortnite	24−27	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	30−33	0−1
Valorant	24−27	0−1