Radeon Pro V520 vs RX 5950 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.84
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 21Navi 12
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202304
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1635 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors21,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate523.2230.4
Floating-point processing power16.74 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 225 Watt

RX 5950 XT has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has 55.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5950 XT and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5950 XT is a desktop card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5950 XT
Radeon RX 5950 XT
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.